Head-to-Head Comparison 3/7 Shared Core Features

Airtable vs Make (Integromat)

In our head-to-head analysis of Airtable ($20/user/mo, rated 4.6/5) versus Make (Integromat) ($9/mo, rated 4.7/5), Airtable stands out with native support for Interactive Kanban Boards, Strategic Roadmaps & Gantt, while Make (Integromat) matches core capabilities with competitive pricing starting at $9/mo.

Try Airtable → Try Make (Integromat) →
Feature / Benchmark
Airtable
Freemium
Make (Integromat)
Freemium
Starting Price $20/user/mo $9/mo
User Rating ★ 4.6 / 5.0 ★ 4.7 / 5.0
Sprints & Agile Cycles
Built-in support for time-boxed sprints, iterations, and agile backlog management.
✕ Not Native ✕ Not Native
Interactive Kanban Boards
Visual drag-and-drop workflow tracking with custom status columns and swimlanes.
✓ Supported ✕ Not Native
Strategic Roadmaps & Gantt
Timeline visualization, project milestone dependencies, and executive portfolio views.
✓ Supported ✕ Not Native
Native Time Tracking
In-app timers, billable hours tracking, and detailed timesheet reporting.
✕ Not Native ✕ Not Native
No-Code Workflow Automations
Trigger-based automations to assign tasks, sync statuses, and send notifications.
✓ Supported ✓ Supported
AI Copilot & Smart Triage
Generative AI assistance for summarizing issues, auto-labeling, and drafting updates.
✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Enterprise Security & Governance
SOC2 Type II compliance, SAML SSO single sign-on, and granular role permissions.
✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Official Access Visit Airtable → Visit Make (Integromat) →

Airtable Detailed Assessment

What We Like (Pros)

  • Powerful relational data modeling with zero SQL knowledge
  • Dynamic interface designer for internal business apps
  • Rich JavaScript scripting extensions

Key Limitations (Cons)

  • Substantial cost jump on paid tiers
  • Hard row limits per base on lower plans
  • Overkill for simple personal task lists

Make (Integromat) Detailed Assessment

What We Like (Pros)

  • Visual drag-and-drop canvas handles infinite branching, loops, and JSON arrays
  • 5x to 10x more cost-effective per operation than Zapier
  • Full raw HTTP request and webhook control

Key Limitations (Cons)

  • Steeper learning curve for non-technical users
  • Debugging complex JSON iterators requires patience
  • Slightly smaller long-tail app catalog than Zapier

Choosing Between Airtable and Make (Integromat)

Which is more cost-effective: Airtable or Make (Integromat)?

Make (Integromat) starts at an entry rate of $9/mo (Freemium), whereas Airtable begins at $20/user/mo. For teams prioritizing lean software budgets, Make (Integromat) provides an accessible starting point.

How do Airtable and Make (Integromat) compare in verified user ratings?

Make (Integromat) holds the edge with a verified rating of 4.7/5.0, praised especially for Visual drag-and-drop canvas handles infinite branching, loops, and JSON arrays. Meanwhile, Airtable scores 4.6/5.0.

When should you choose Airtable over Make (Integromat)?

Choose Airtable if your priority is Powerful relational data modeling with zero SQL knowledge within Knowledge Base & Collaborative Workspace. Opt for Make (Integromat) if you require Visual drag-and-drop canvas handles infinite branching, loops, and JSON arrays and $9/mo pricing.