Head-to-Head Comparison 3/7 Shared Core Features

Make (Integromat) vs Zapier

In our head-to-head analysis of Make (Integromat) ($9/mo, rated 4.7/5) versus Zapier ($19.99/mo, rated 4.7/5), Make (Integromat) delivers dependable standard features for Workflow Automation & Collaboration, while Zapier counters with specialized capabilities in Interactive Kanban Boards.

Try Make (Integromat) → Try Zapier →
Feature / Benchmark
Make (Integromat)
Freemium
Zapier
Freemium
Starting Price $9/mo $19.99/mo
User Rating ★ 4.7 / 5.0 ★ 4.7 / 5.0
Sprints & Agile Cycles
Built-in support for time-boxed sprints, iterations, and agile backlog management.
✕ Not Native ✕ Not Native
Interactive Kanban Boards
Visual drag-and-drop workflow tracking with custom status columns and swimlanes.
✕ Not Native ✓ Supported
Strategic Roadmaps & Gantt
Timeline visualization, project milestone dependencies, and executive portfolio views.
✕ Not Native ✕ Not Native
Native Time Tracking
In-app timers, billable hours tracking, and detailed timesheet reporting.
✕ Not Native ✕ Not Native
No-Code Workflow Automations
Trigger-based automations to assign tasks, sync statuses, and send notifications.
✓ Supported ✓ Supported
AI Copilot & Smart Triage
Generative AI assistance for summarizing issues, auto-labeling, and drafting updates.
✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Enterprise Security & Governance
SOC2 Type II compliance, SAML SSO single sign-on, and granular role permissions.
✓ Supported ✓ Supported
Official Access Visit Make (Integromat) → Visit Zapier →

Make (Integromat) Detailed Assessment

What We Like (Pros)

  • Visual drag-and-drop canvas handles infinite branching, loops, and JSON arrays
  • 5x to 10x more cost-effective per operation than Zapier
  • Full raw HTTP request and webhook control

Key Limitations (Cons)

  • Steeper learning curve for non-technical users
  • Debugging complex JSON iterators requires patience
  • Slightly smaller long-tail app catalog than Zapier

Zapier Detailed Assessment

What We Like (Pros)

  • Unrivaled catalog of 7,000+ native app connectors
  • Zero coding required—business users build Zaps in minutes
  • Includes Zapier Tables, Interfaces, and AI Chatbots

Key Limitations (Cons)

  • Task-based pricing becomes expensive at high execution volumes
  • Linear workflow editor is less visual for complex branching than Make
  • Polling intervals on lower tiers are 2–15 minutes

Choosing Between Make (Integromat) and Zapier

Which is more cost-effective: Make (Integromat) or Zapier?

Make (Integromat) starts at an entry rate of $9/mo (Freemium), whereas Make (Integromat) begins at $9/mo. For teams prioritizing lean software budgets, Make (Integromat) provides an accessible starting point.

How do Make (Integromat) and Zapier compare in verified user ratings?

Make (Integromat) holds the edge with a verified rating of 4.7/5.0, praised especially for Visual drag-and-drop canvas handles infinite branching, loops, and JSON arrays. Meanwhile, Make (Integromat) scores 4.7/5.0.

When should you choose Make (Integromat) over Zapier?

Choose Make (Integromat) if your priority is Visual drag-and-drop canvas handles infinite branching, loops, and JSON arrays within Workflow Automation & Collaboration. Opt for Zapier if you require Unrivaled catalog of 7,000+ native app connectors and $19.99/mo pricing.